Global Flourishing Study

Follow the Study

Sign up to receive our email updates.

Email

About the Study

  • Overview
  • Team

Explore

  • Research Explorer
  • Chat
  • Videos

Resources

  • In the News
  • Reports
  • Access the Data

Funding Partners

The Global Flourishing Study is generously funded by the David & Carol Myers Foundation, Fetzer Institute, the John Templeton Foundation, the Paul Foster Family Foundation, Templeton Religion Trust, Templeton World Charity Foundation, Well-Being for Planet Earth, and the Well Being Trust.

Partners

Baylor University – Institute for Studies of ReligionGallupCenter for Open ScienceThe Human Flourishing Program – Harvard University
© Global Flourishing Study · 2026·Terms·Privacy
Global Flourishing Study
  • Research Explorer
  • Chat
  • Videos
Back to Research Explorer
Mental & Physical Health20257 min read

Who Smokes vs. How Much: The Real Story

A cross-national analysis of demographic variation in daily smoking across 22 countries

Notable finding

Widowed people have low smoking rates but high intensity.

By
Jang, Sung Joon et al.
Participants
200,000
Countries
22
Journal
Scientific Reports
DOI
10.1038/s41598-024-76318-9
Chat with paper
Chat with paper
§1

Key Takeaways

01

The percentage of people who smoke in a country is not related to how many cigarettes daily smokers consume, indicating that both measures are needed to understand public health risks.

02

Demographic factors such as age, gender, marital status, education, and religious service attendance are all associated with daily smoking habits across the 22 countries studied.

03

Certain groups, such as widowed and retired individuals, have a low prevalence of smoking but smoke a high number of cigarettes daily, a high-risk pattern that would be missed by only looking at smoking rates.

§2

Why It Matters

A country's smoking problem isn't just how many people light up, but how intensely the remaining smokers continue to smoke.

This research has direct implications for public health policy worldwide. If governments and health organizations rely only on smoking prevalence — the most common metric — they risk underestimating the danger in places where few people smoke but those who do smoke heavily. Countries like Australia, India, Sweden, and the United States fall into a 'low-prevalence, middle-intensity' category, meaning their smoking-related health risks could be greater than prevalence alone suggests. Conversely, places like Hong Kong have relatively high prevalence but low intensity, suggesting different policy priorities — prevention of smoking initiation rather than cessation programs. The study also identifies overlooked high-risk groups, such as widowed and retired individuals, whose heavy smoking would go unnoticed by prevalence-focused surveys. For the scientific community, the findings make the case that future tobacco surveys should always include a question about daily cigarette quantity, not just whether someone smokes. Without intensity data, we are flying blind on a major predictor of disease and death.

This research has direct implications for public health policy worldwide. If governments and health organizations rely only on smoking prevalence — the most common metric — they risk underestimating the danger in places where few people smoke but those who do smoke heavily. Countries like Australia, India, Sweden, and the United States fall into a 'low-prevalence, middle-intensity' category, meaning their smoking-related health risks could be greater than prevalence alone suggests. Conversely, places like Hong Kong have relatively high prevalence but low intensity, suggesting different policy priorities — prevention of smoking initiation rather than cessation programs. The study also identifies overlooked high-risk groups, such as widowed and retired individuals, whose heavy smoking would go unnoticed by prevalence-focused surveys. For the scientific community, the findings make the case that future tobacco surveys should always include a question about daily cigarette quantity, not just whether someone smokes. Without intensity data, we are flying blind on a major predictor of disease and death.

A country's smoking problem isn't just how many people light up, but how intensely the remaining smokers continue to smoke.

§3

The Story

Most research on cigarette smoking around the world focuses on one number: what percentage of people smoke. But this study of over 200,000 adults across 22 countries asked a second, rarely examined question — among people who do smoke daily, how many cigarettes do they actually go through? The researchers called this 'intensity,' and they found something striking: intensity and prevalence (the share of people who smoke) were not significantly related.

Widowed people are among the least likely to be smokers, but those who do smoke are some of the heaviest and most at-risk.

In other words, a country where few people smoke might still have smokers who consume a lot of cigarettes each day, and a country where many people smoke might have lighter smokers on average. This matters because the number of cigarettes someone smokes daily is a key predictor of disease risk — even a few a day can cause serious harm. The study also looked at who smokes how much across age, gender, marital status, employment, education, religious service attendance, and immigration status. Some patterns were familiar: men tended to smoke more than women, and more-educated people smoked less.

But intensity revealed hidden groups that prevalence alone would miss. For example, widowed people had the lowest smoking rate of any marital group — but among those who did smoke, they had the second-highest cigarette consumption. Retirees showed a similar pattern: low prevalence, high intensity. And in 8 of the 22 countries, female smokers actually consumed more cigarettes per day than male smokers, a detail completely invisible if you only look at how many men versus women smoke at all. The findings suggest that to understand the true health risks of smoking in any country, we need to count not just who smokes, but how heavily.

Figure
53%
Daily smoking in Türkiye

In Türkiye, 53% of the adult population smokes cigarettes on a daily basis, the highest prevalence among the 22 countries studied.

Figure
2.4x
Male vs. Female Smoking

On average, men consume 2.4 times more cigarettes per capita per day than women across the 22 countries surveyed.

Figure
+49 points
Range in Smoking Prevalence

The prevalence of daily smoking varied by 49 percentage points across nations, from a high of 53% in Türkiye to a low of 4% in Nigeria and Tanzania.

Figure
1.7:1
Gender Gap in Philippines

In the Philippines, male smokers consume cigarettes at a rate 1.7 times higher than female smokers, representing one of the largest gender gaps in smoking intensity.

Figures
53%
Daily smoking in Türkiye

In Türkiye, 53% of the adult population smokes cigarettes on a daily basis, the highest prevalence among the 22 countries studied.

2.4x
Male vs. Female Smoking

On average, men consume 2.4 times more cigarettes per capita per day than women across the 22 countries surveyed.

+49 points
Range in Smoking Prevalence

The prevalence of daily smoking varied by 49 percentage points across nations, from a high of 53% in Türkiye to a low of 4% in Nigeria and Tanzania.

1.7:1
Gender Gap in Philippines

In the Philippines, male smokers consume cigarettes at a rate 1.7 times higher than female smokers, representing one of the largest gender gaps in smoking intensity.

§4

Reader Questions

Cite

Research Details
& Citation

Chat with this paper
Published
2025
Journal
Scientific Reports
Participants
200,000
Countries
22
Cite this paper
Jang, S. J., de la Rosa, P. A., Padgett, R. N., Bradshaw, M., VanderWeele, T. J., & Johnson, B. R. (2025). A cross-national analysis of demographic variation in daily smoking across 22 countries. Scientific Reports, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-76318-9
Tags
smokingphysical-healthagegendermarriagereligion-spirituality
Keep reading

More from this lens

View all research
Who Hurts the Most Around the World?
Mental & Physical Health

Who Hurts the Most Around the World?

Where you live might determine how much you hurt: people in Egypt are more than twice as likely to report being in pain as those in Israel.

2025·Communications Medicine·n=202,898
How Healthy You Feel Depends on Where You Live
Mental & Physical Health

How Healthy You Feel Depends on Where You Live

Would you guess that people in some developing nations report feeling healthier than people in some of the world's wealthiest countries?

2025·BMC Global and Public Health·n=202,898
The Long Shadow of a Painful Childhood
Mental & Physical Health

The Long Shadow of a Painful Childhood

The physical pain you feel today might have roots in events that happened decades ago, when you were a child.

2025·Communications Medicine·n=202,898
In Israel, a Surprising Link Between Faith and Health
Mental & Physical Health

In Israel, a Surprising Link Between Faith and Health

What if being more religious was consistently linked to better health, less pain, and more happiness?

2024·Journal of Religion and Health·n=2916
Who Drinks? A Global Snapshot of Alcohol Use
Mental & Physical Health

Who Drinks? A Global Snapshot of Alcohol Use

Think more education means less drinking? A global study of 200,000 people suggests the opposite.

2026·Communications Medicine·n=202,898
Your Mental Health Isn't Just About You
Mental & Physical Health

Your Mental Health Isn't Just About You

In the Philippines, 1 in 2 people report significant depression symptoms, compared to just 1 in 7 in Poland.

2026·Communications Medicine·n=202,898